desh | (no subject)

(no subject)

If I had to guess right now, I'd go with 33% chance of Biden, 33% Kaine, 17% Sebelius, and 17% Clinton.

I don't think those PUMAs make up as much of the ex-Clintonistas as people think. If he chose Sebelius, the people who weren't going to vote for him ANYWAY would get on the airwaves and say they aren't going to vote for him NOW, but really, most of the ex-Clinton supporters would probably fall in line. However, my money is on the dark horse candidate for VP: Batman. Obama-Batman '08!

--Jeff

Every time I get a text message this week, I think it's the veep pick. Send me a Batman-related text, Jeffy!

You rule.

I take it you got my text? ;-)

--Jeff

I'm not sure, TBH. I explored PUMA for a while, ultimately stepping back as, while I still think there are serious issues w/in the party as revealed vis-a-vis the election I'm unwilling to shoot myself in the foot to prove a point.

That said, I'd say a good 70% of those that I got to know via Campaigning for Hillary are still determined to either vote for McCain or McKinney and a number of those who have swung to the Obama side are very wary about him.

Adding that "a number of those who have swung to the Obama side are very wary about him" is completely unnecessary, IMO. Many people who will be voting for Obama still have reservations about him, but that is true of ANY candidate. Was everyone gung ho about Kerry? No, don't think so. I find it pretty ridiculous how much courting and tiptoeing around there has been in regard to Clinton's supporters. She lost. Sorry, but time to support the candidate who won. It's not even about party unity, that's just how a primary process works. In any primary fight there will be up to 49% of voters in the party who initially wanted someone else. Ok, gotta stop thinking about this before I get too angry.

I apologize for any inadvertent offense. As I noted, I was speaking from the group of people I got to know -- my own mind has been made up, and I'm not here to sway anyone's opinions, nor did I intend to make any statement beyond my own observations. So, again, apologies if my words were more charged than I intended.

Sorry, no need to apologize. It wasn't what you said so much as it set off a rant. I guess my basic point is that a lot of people are still wary about Obama, but it is something that is noted (by many people other than you) about former Clinton supporters who are supporting him now. Ha, maybe I'm just jealous that the Clinton qualms people are getting more attention than the pandering about tax cuts people like me, or the FISA waffling people, or whatever else.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only