desh ([personal profile] desh) wrote2005-05-24 05:24 pm

computer help?

When we try to send email from our computer at work to more than 5 people, we get an error message email from "System Administrator" with the subject "Undeliverable: [original subject]" and this text:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

Subject: [original subject]
Sent: [sent timestamp]

The following recepient(s) could not be reached:

'[test email address 6]' on [timestamp]
452 4.5.3 Too Many Recipients

'[test email address 7]' on [timestamp]
452 4.5.3 Too Many Recipients


And so on, for all but 5 of the email addresses. (The email goes through to the 5 addresses not listed.)

First of all, there is no System Administrator. It's just 2 of us in an office on a dialup. Second of all, there's no email address associated with System Administrator. (This is Outlook, which tries to be extremely helpful by obfuscating confusing data, like email addresses. Though there may not be an email address at all, which would seem to make this entirely Outlook's fault.)

I've tried changing SMTP servers entirely. I've tried turning off Norton's outgoing email scanning. I've tried sending to entirely different sets of addresses (more than 5 at a time). I've tried looking all around Outlook's options for anything related to a maximum outgoing recepient list. I've tried googling for that error code. Nothing.

Any other ideas?

[identity profile] jdcohen.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, don't use whatever shit you're using currently. That, or get a fucking webmail account.

--Jeff

[identity profile] jdcohen.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
If it's an office, spring for a fucking shared DSL line or cable connection. What are you, living in the goddamn Dark Ages?

--Jeff

[identity profile] conana.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
==jdcohen
I suppose that you could debug this by finding someone running an smtp server, turning on logging, and seeing what it gets from your outlook boxen. But that seems like more effort than should be justified. You seem to already have a strong case that it is just Outlook's fault. 452 is the SMTP error number for "Insufficient System Storage", but implementations are required to support at least 100 recipients, and exceeding that throws error number 552. (Yeah, you probably looked that up yourself. Nothing to see here.)

[identity profile] jdcohen.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 11:43 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, I think I've got a hunch...

Based on what [livejournal.com profile] conana just wrote, I'm thinking it's your ISP that's doing this to you - "System Administrator" would/could be the ISP's auto response to your multi-email shenanigans. What ISP exactly are you using and are you registered with them as a non-profit?

My guess is that your ISP is limiting your email sending capabilities themselves. It makes sense... the problem isn't the SMTP server, because, as you said, you tried several different ones. The problem isn't Outlook, because Outlook CAN and DOES send out mass emailings of more than 5 people at a time somewhat reliably. The problem must exist in between when the email(s) get sent from your computer, through the ISP, to the SMTP server. I'll bet dollars to donuts that's where you get these "rejections" (and subsequent "rejection notification emails").

That's also probably why you can't find anything on this mysterious "error" online (your ISP is probably small and not enough people have encountered this same problem). They could be doing it because of bandwidth concerns (though spamming over dialup would be INCREDIBLY stupid, they might block over 5 recipients at a time to discourage it further), they could be doing it because they don't offer more than 5 outgoing emails at a time with your current account (but you can upgrade for a low, low cost of ...), or they could be doing it because they're fucktarded assholes who hate you and want you to kill yourself. Either way, I'd call them up and ask. Of course, the best solution to your problem is to GET BROADBAND, you silly non-profit types.

--Jeff

P.S. No, I am not willing to bankroll your organization's acquisition of broadband. Any organization stupid enough to be unwilling to give its members broadband access in the first place does not deserve my charity.

[identity profile] t3chnomag3.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 11:53 am (UTC)(link)
Did you try using a different emailing program as a test?

[identity profile] rarcke.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, as much as I love thunderbird it is not as intuitive as it needs to be to be a mass solution in the work enviroment. I detest Outlook, but so many people learned on it and have never touched anything else that it's way easier to live with outlook and problems than re-train a lot of grumpy people. (Besides, outlook with problems is practically it's natural state).

Good luck

-Robin

[identity profile] flyinbutrs.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Well... since you're using dial up for a two person office, I'm guessing you're not really in a corporate situation in the traditional sense. I wouldn't worry about using thunderbird.

I have an odd theory about your e-mail issue... are all the addresses in your to: box? Try CCing all but one of the addresses. It might help... it might not. But some SMTP servers limit the number of direct recipients.

[identity profile] t3chnomag3.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I never said use TB permanently. Outlook is clearly made for the corporate environment, with all its integrated tasks and things like MS Exchange. But to completely rule out Outlook as the culprit I figured you'd have to try some other email client. Then you can go and whine to Netscape all you want about their screwed up internet.

But as flyinbutrs pointed out so well, you're not exactly the image of "corporate." And since there are only 2 of you, and one of you is clearly a nerd, the other one could always be taught "the way." And if you need a calendar function in addition to email function, TB has a calendar extension I believe, or Mozilla makes Sunbird.

You also don't need to use TB. You could try Outlook Express, The Bat, Pegasus Mail, or any number of other clients.

[identity profile] t3chnomag3.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)
They're both different email clients that I've heard of (at least I think Pegasus Mail is an email client, it's been a while since I heard its name. I know The Bat is because lots of TB users once used it). Those were the only other clients I could think of off the top of my head. I've never used them before.

You could always try Seamonkey.

[identity profile] conana.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Now I'm picturing tunneling SMTP over some other protocol. It should be possible...I wonder how I set up a server to support SMTP over SSH....

Tunneling over SSH

[identity profile] dredpiraterober.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes