I see the appeal of not having to eat in that you could considerably shrink your ecological footprint (right? you wouldn't require energy intake in some other form?) -- I might do it on principle if I were also saving the money.
Surely Desh wouldn't violate the laws of thermodynamics, even in a hypothetical question.... I suppose some other energy source might be lower footprint, but I worry about cutting people off from the simplest pleasures in life, and from the most basic ties to the rest of life.
(A few years ago I would have taken the trade. Now food is my major social activity, and I like it this way.)
no subject
no subject
(A few years ago I would have taken the trade. Now food is my major social activity, and I like it this way.)
no subject
no subject