(no subject)
Wow, Facebook just got a LOT more stalkeriffic!
...okay, fine, I'll try to act like a "real blog" and link to stuff I found on Google.
Wow, Facebook just got a LOT more stalkeriffic! And some random people agree with me!
...okay, fine, I'll try to act like a "real blog" and link to stuff I found on Google.
Wow, Facebook just got a LOT more stalkeriffic! And some random people agree with me!

no subject
Granted, I don't think LJ's implementation is nearly as intrusive, since they're not asking for the sorts of intimate details Facebook assumes you want to provide. But maybe that's also because it also provides a new stream of immediate amusement for me - "hey, neat icon, wonder where she got it from, can i use it?"
no subject
Some of the "missing" things on LJ are because they're just not that thorough yet, but some I bet are deliberate. Because LJ developers already know what Facebook devs will probably learn from user feedback over the next few days: there's a key difference between available data and easily available/aggregatable data. Moving something from the former category to the latter requires as much careful consideration as making the data available in the first place does.
no subject