Labor, Schmabor

[desh]

You know, I try to get behind the concept of union politics as strongly as Ruby K and Josh do. And I really admire them for all the work they do. But then something like this happens.

The story is that a plumbers' union in Philly was protesting over the plan to install waterless urinals (still not quite sure how that works) in a new skyscraper in Philadelphia. They were upset about the loss of union work that would result from this decision. So what compromise was reached? The waterless urinals would still be installed, but water pipes would be run to them anyway.

Someone, anyone, please explain to me how the unions are in the right here, or how this solution makes sense at all? I'm just not getting it.

Comments

[t3chnomag3.livejournal.com]

You're trying to use logic to explain a situation that is better explained by what G'Kar might call "enlightened self-interest." The unions are advocating for themselves, because in the end, the only person you can genuinely expect to advocate for you, is you. That's the simplest explanation I can give you.

[desh]

I don't know if the PR created by a deal like this is in the unions' best interest.

[t3chnomag3.livejournal.com]

In this town, PR doesn't seem to matter. Those who dislike the union will always dislike the union, and anything the union does will be spun to appear to be negative. People who support the union will continue to support the union even if they do the occasional stupid stuff. There just aren't a lot of you "on the fence" people here.