desh ([personal profile] desh) wrote2006-01-29 10:39 pm

All together, my friends are an accident

Because I'm bored and a nerd, and an Excel master, I decided to calculate the geographic average of everyone on my Friends list right now. (Well, minus the people who I never talk to anymore or whose location I don't know.)

The Hawaii and England/Israel people approximately canceled each other out, as did the British Columbia and Florida folks.

And I end up with an average practically on top of a town called Accident in Western Maryland. Which puts me barely closest to [livejournal.com profile] bloomable, who just beats out the Pittsburgh folks, with the DC-area folks probably edging out Baltimore, Richmond, and Hurricane WV for third place.

[identity profile] bumonyou.livejournal.com 2006-02-01 06:30 pm (UTC)(link)
now, let me ask you something, and it may just be that this question can be answered by my lack of mather-ma-tatical savvy, but here goes: given the placement of the dateline, wouldn't it be impossible to have an average time that rests near the dateline, even when it should (barring having a "true-er" averaging system than simply taking GMT+'s or GMT-'s and averaging them out)?

Say, for example, that your two sample times are Honolulu (GMT-10) and Auckland (GMT+12). Now, geographically speaking, your average time zone should rest between the short distance between the two, that is, GMT+11 or +12. BUT, just averaging the GMT's would place you...I dont know, somewhere in Europe, whatever.

And, incidentally, Honolulu (GMT-10) and Israel (GMT+2) are exactly 12 hours apart, no matter which way you cut it. So the real question is clearly: have you got a good system to decide which way to average if (God forbid) you only had friends in HI and IS?

[identity profile] bumonyou.livejournal.com 2006-02-01 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)
oh TWAT! looks like you already answered this question. Sort of?